Contacto

Report on – 33rd IC Resolution 4: Restoring Family Links while respecting privacy, including as it relates to personal data protection (33IC/19/R4) – British Red Cross

  1. ¿ Ha incorporado el Estado/la Sociedad Nacional/la institución los empeños contenidos en esta resolución en los planes estratégicos u operativos pertinentes?

    Los compromisos han sido incorporados en
    estrategia
    política

    A internacional, nacional nivel

    Explicación:

    As part of the BRC’s participation in the Movement RFL Code of Conduct on Data Protection Application Group and membership of both the Archiving Policy and Deletion thematic working groups, we have contributed to the creation and dissemination of standard archiving policy and deletion guidelines for Family Links Network (FLN) members.

    In 2020, Migration and Displacement was identified and incorporated as one of the three areas of focus for the BRC Strategy 2030. Through Strategy 2030, the BRC has committed to ensuring that “every person experiencing displacement in the UK has the opportunity to rebuild their lives, maintaining and restoring links with their loved ones” – including through implementation of new information technologies and development of staff and volunteers’ data skills and capacity – by 2030.

    The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) is assisting the British Red Cross in seeking confirmation from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) that the British Red Cross may use the public interest basis when processing personal data related to the carrying out of our humanitarian activities.

  2. Ha trabajado el Estado/la Sociedad Nacional/la institución con otros asociados para poner en práctica los empeños contenidos en esta resolución?

    En asociación con:
    gobierno y/o autoridades públicas
    CICR/Federación Internacional
    otras Sociedades Nacionales de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja
    asociados en los ámbitos humanitario y de desarrollo (por ejemplo, Naciones Unidas, organizaciones no gubernamentales)

    Ejemplos de cooperación:

    The BRC has agreed to use the Family Links Answers (FLA) tool’s ‘Interoperability’ function, to facilitate secure exchange of cases with other National Societies and ICRC delegations.

    Following the cyber incident in 2022, the BRC has also agreed to use the ICRC Central Tracing Agency secure system, ASPERA.

    The BRC participated in the Movement’s Application Group for the RFL Code of Conduct on Data Protection and became a member of two thematic working groups: Archiving Policy and Deletion.

    We have worked closely with the UK Information Commissioner’s Office on responding to the cyber incident in 2022, identifying 1,553 priority cases of potential data breach and processing all cases for notification.

  3. ¿Ha habido dificultades para poner en práctica los empeños contenidos en esta resolución?

    Dificultades en relación con:
    otros asociados

    Describa detalladamente estas dificultades:

    Our challenges have arisen mainly from incompatibility with external partners’ standards and practices:

    There have been challenges working with UK Missing Person’s Unit (UKMPU), part of the government’s National Crime Agency, to develop a pilot that aims to provide answers to families whose loved ones may have died in boat sinkings.

    For a period, NHS Scotland ceased their letter-forwarding system used by the British Red Cross tracing service. NHS Scotland expressed concern that the use of personal data in this way did not meet GDPR conditions. The British Red Cross brought to the attention of NHS Scotland Article 49 of the GDPR, which notes the derogations with respect to humanitarian work, as well as 33rd International Conference Resolution 4. NHS Scotland subsequently changed their position and they have resumed the letter-forwarding service (for the British Red Cross only as far as we are aware, and not for other organisations).

    As other National Societies have also experienced, data transfer to third parties may present a challenge due to incompatible standards, practices and systems. The International Organization for Migration (IOM), particularly, cannot accept information via Egress and this has presented an obstacle to data sharing. Instead, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) was carried out and a joint SharePoint Site has been created.

  4. ¿Han incidido los empeños contenidos en esta resolución en el trabajo y la dirección del Estado/la Sociedad Nacional/la institución?

    Tipo de repercusión:
    fortalecimiento de la cooperación entre el gobierno o las autoridades públicas y la Sociedad Nacional
    aumento de la eficacia y la eficiencia de los programas y operaciones
    desarrollo y uso de herramientas o metodologías innovadoras
    formación y capacidad de los miembros del personal y de los voluntarios (en el caso de las Sociedades Nacionales);

    Describa detalladamente las repercusiones:

    The BRC devised a data mapping exercise spreadsheet to map all data storage and to identify and mitigate risks.

    To minimise data protection risks, the BRC conducted Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for tools including Trace the Face, Family Links Answers (FLA), and the video conferencing tool used by the prison service.

    Data protection is now included in our FLA training content, ensuring that new FLA users are aware of the risks and responsibilities related to data processing.

    All our RFL caseworkers are now using Egress software for sharing personal information with external organisations via email. The Egress software is embedded in our email system, ensuring secure transfer of emails and documents to non-secure email addresses.

    The BRC has produced an online training course titled ‘Data Matters’, which is now mandatory for all staff and volunteers. A yearly refresher of this training is also mandatory.

    Key guidance on data protection and data collection practices is included in our new casework manual, which acts as a ‘one-stop shop’ resource for all members of the International Family Tracing team.

  5. 5. Han incidido los empeños contenidos en esta resolución en las comunidades a las que el Estado/la Sociedad Nacional/la institución presta servicios?

    Describa las repercusiones:

    BRC personal information leaflets for RFL services have now been translated into 16 languages, providing enquirers with information on our data processing activities, their data rights, and who and how to contact if they have any concerns or questions.

    Dashboards for the FLA casework management tool now monitor any issues related to data quality and consent, improving accountability and oversight.

    We have removed around 16,000 contact records on FLA, as part of ensuring respect for individuals’ data rights.

    Following the 2022 cyber incident, 1,553 priority individuals were appropriately notified of the potential breach of their personal data.

El Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja, la Federación Internacional de Sociedades de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja y la Comisión Permanente de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja –en su función de órgano mandatario de la Conferencia Internacional de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja (la Conferencia)– no pueden asumir responsabilidad alguna, bajo ningún concepto, por contenidos o publicaciones que generen los usuarios en esta base de datos. El equipo responsable del sitio web se reserva el derecho de eliminar cualquier publicación o contenido que considere incompatible con los Principios Fundamentales del Movimiento Internacional de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja.